"[...] we, the National Security Whistleblowers, want to go on record
one more time to reiterate the significant issues and cases that were
duly reported to the 9/11 commission by those of us from the intelligence,
aviation, and law enforcement communities, but ended up being censored
and omitted."

A wag once famously said that Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot was a play where nothing happened… twice. The two former co-chairmen of the 9/11 commission report, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, have released a new book, Without Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission. This book goes Beckett one better – it is the third act of veneer over substance, self-aggrandizement over serious analysis, and cliché over perspicacity. It is another calculated attempt by the former commissioners to place themselves in the media spotlight, and to overcome the humiliation of their widely criticized and mostly debunked report. It is a vapid and substanceless attempt to claim moral high ground and present the cochairmen as heroes of honesty. It would be a farce, except that it has no story line, save the aggrandizement of the authors. At least they are consistent in doing nothing and proclaiming that to be a sign of their devotion to the country and the government. Beckett once said that "habit is the ballast that chains the dog to its vomit," and by this measure the chain restraining Kean and Hamilton is a short one indeed. .........

On the way to the gas chamber,
the Congress of Cowards lying down for Patriot Acts 1 and 2,
the Electronic Surveillance Modernization Act,
and now the Military Commissions Act of 2006,
trashing the US Constitution, the Geneva Conventions, the UN Charter,
the Nuremberg Principles, and all sense of decency, morality,
reason, and concern for civilization and the perpetuation of the human race,
I draft a little statement, as modest as can be,
considering the circumstances, and ask the "9/11 truth" researchers--
there are thousands of them, hundreds of websites,
polls showing more than a hundred million Americans agree
in contradistinction to the mainlining government-addicted corporate-fed media--

I ask them, can we please stop bickering about planes or no planes
or whether it was the Illuminati, the Bilderbergers, Zionist billionaires,
the Freemasons, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission,
the High Cabal, the military-industrial-complex, or the CIA behind it all
and just get the damned Bushcons out of office, so we can breathe again?

Can we just say this one thing, with one voice, loudly, together, while we still can,
before the brownshirts start marching in the streets, before they start sending us
to the FEMA prison camps they're building, and throw away the key and kill us
as "enemy combatants" and "terrorist suspects," which they now can do
under the new law of the land of the United Police States of America?
Can we please just do this, while we still can, while we still have the internet,
talk radio, and the right to assemble and talk to each other, and once in a blue moon
a program on C-Span, or even the fleeting disdainful attention of O'Reilly or Hannity & Colmes?

The Germans had none of this in 1933, when their own parliament lay down and died
without a fight. The thugs were already marching, breaking bones and windows,
leaving no wriggle room. We're not there yet, but not far away, and when that day comes,
my fellow "researchers," you will drown in tears of shame for having failed to understand
that in times like these, as always, l'unité fait la force, and that alone you are nothing
and worse than nothing because you betray us all, waiting for your private revolution
that will never come, and that you'll miss, even if it does, due to your unfortunate
death, and very likely the nuclear incineration of the rest of us, or the slower agony
of starvation and disease by enivironmental holocaust, inside or outside of a FEMA gulag.

"Oh, I'm so sorry," you will say. "I just didn't think it was partisan issue.
"After all, the Democrats were in on it too, weren't they? They were all in on it, weren't they?
"I wanted real change, not just a change of puppets."

"No!" you say--now, when you can still talk--"I won't sign on to this:"

It has become abundantly clear to a majority of the American people, not to mention the rest of the world, that the Bush administration has utterly failed to conduct a satsifactory investigation into the events of 9/11. There has been no satisfactory explanation for the failure of our air defenses on that day, and the suspicion that the government itself was complicit in the attacks is widespread and growing rapidly. Since the 9/11 attacks have been used by the Bush administration to justify its so-called "war on terror" at home and abroad, causing the loss of fundamental civil liberties as well as tens of thousands of lives, the failure to properly investigate those attacks is inexcusable and intolerable. We are bitterly disappointed and equally outraged by the failure of the mainstream media and Congress to demand action by the executive branch befitting of a democratic government.

We therefore plead, with the utmost urgency, that the American people do everything possible to elect people in the coming elections who will stand up to those in power, defend our right to know the full truth about the events of Sept. 11, 2001, and restore peace and our constitutional rights.

"Oh, no!" says one. " The only statement I'll sign is: They didn't really use planes on 911."

"Oh no!" another no-planer says. "This list insults my intelligence. Take me off it.
"They are all in on it. I won't agree to any such statement and I will attack it and ridicule it wherever it pops up."

Another one instructs me: "Find out the difference between a democracy and a republic.
"Leave me out of your infantile fantasies."

A plane-hugger says, "I don't want to be on this discussion list. Please remove me from it."

But most say nothing at all.
I guess it's an insult to their intelligence as well.
They know it all. They have seen the light
and will soon smell the gas.

Jebb... þetta hlýtur að springa allt í loft upp... þe. ef menn ætla að leifa skynseminni að haa eitthvert hlutverk í nánustu framtíð.

Opinbera kenningin er IMPOSSIBLE.

Famed Watergate reporter Bob Woodward is out with a new book, State of Denial. While it focuses on the lies of Bush and Rumsfeld regarding Iraq, it reveals that Condaleeza Rice was warned on July 10, 2001 by George Tenet and his counter-terrism expert, Cofer Black, that a serious attack was imminent.

In essence, Woodward shows that Condi blocked this key warning with what Tenet called "a brush-off". This is gross dereliction of duty and malfeasance, which are seriously punishable crimes. She then perjured herself in front of the 9/11 Commission, as is seen in the Mitchell article excerpt below, when she said the Aug. 6th Presidential Daily Briefing wasn't specific, was past tense, and only mentioned threats from abroad! After these criminal acts, SHE GOT PROMOTED TO SECRETARY OF STATE! What does this say? It incriminates the whole administration. ......

Einmitt og það er algjörlega þýðingarlaust að þvarga við einhverja
útúrsnúningasjúka rugludalla hérna um ómögulega hluti. Það er búið
að reyna það hérna misserum saman en það er bara vonlaust. Hvers
vegna að vera að gera þessu útúrsnúningahyski greiða með endalausu
þvargi um sömu ómögulegu hlutina?

Jafnvel doktorshálfvitinn hefur gefist upp á að gera sig að fífli með því
að kóa með þessum rugludöllum og er þá mikið sagt.

Þeir sem bakka upp ómögulega dellu frá siðblindu rusli í Washington sem
er algjörlega lyga- og blekkingasjúkt hljóta eðli málsins samkvæmt að
vera á svipuðu siðferðisstigi og ruslið sem þeir bakka upp. Eitthvað laðar
þá að þessu siðblinda rusli. Orsök - afleiðing.

Láttu bara þessa rugludalla ræða málin sín á milli. Þá drepast þessir tilgangs-
lausu þræðir þeirra fljótt enda hefur þetta ekkert fram að færa.

Einmitt og það er algjörlega þýðingarlaust að þvarga við einhverja
útúrsnúningasjúka rugludalla hérna um ómögulega hluti. Það er búið
að reyna það hérna misserum saman en það er bara vonlaust. Hvers
vegna að vera að gera þessu útúrsnúningahyski greiða með endalausu
þvargi um sömu ómögulegu hlutina?

Við erum enn að bíða eftir útskýringum frá þér um rykskýið á þessum þræðu þar sem ég fór yfir útreikningana hans Hoffmans.

Sannanir og aftur sannanir... það er alveg sama hversu miklu lofti þið blásið og lítið þið gerið úr þeim er reyna koma ykkur á beinu brautina þá hefur ykkur alltaf skort sannanir fyrir máli ykkar og eins og Broddi litli segir þá er það FACT!

Þetta er afar athyglisverður þáttur. Ekki síst þegar hann segir frá hvernig menn komu sér undan að birti með viðtali við hann bútinn frá hruni WTC7 og að sjá svo hvernig þetta var í útsendingu. Það verður fáránlega augljóst að stóru stöðvunum er bannað að sýna hrun WTC7. - En óskiljanlegt hversvegna nema menn skilji hve stór feluleikurinn er.

A white paper released on February 3, 1964
______________________________________

"The documents indicate that a B707, the largest commercial aircraft at the time, flying at 600 mph was considered and that the analysis indicated that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact"
...
wtc.nist.gov/WTC_

Ef ég reyni að stafa þetta í einni málsgrein þá virðast
stjórnendur Bush og Blair halda að ef þeir geti náð valdi
á olíuverslun í heiminum með því að innlima Íran og Írak
í engilsaxneska efnahagsöxulinn þá geti þeir þar með komið
í veg fyrir andlát dollarans og hann verði þá áfram undirstaða
efnahagskerfis heimsins og vestrænar elítur verði þá jafnframt
áfram við stjórn téðs kerfis. Þetta er grunnástæða hollywood-
sjósins 11. sept. og réttlæting þess sem við höfum orðið vitni
að síðan. Nei, kall með fartölvu í helli í Afganistan og einhverjir
gæjar með dúkahnífa settu þetta ekki á svið.

Og svo sagði ólyginn mér að Bush litli sé að leita sér að sínum eigin helli, til að felast í eftir að hann hrökklast úr pólitíkinni...

Svei mér þá, ætli Bin Laden hafi ekki fengið inni hjá Grýlu og Leppalúða! Þetta líkist æ meir einhverri þjóðsögunni, sagan af þessum blessaða Bin Laden sem aldrei finnst, ekki frekar en Grýla gamla!

It is astounding that so many people who denounce the war against Iraq are so naïve about its origins. One of the strongest arguments by those opposed to the Bush/PNAC war policy in the Middle East maintains that there was NO connection between Iraq and the events of September 11th. That allegation, while well motivated, is entirely and absolutely false.

No, Iraq was not involved with, nor did its leader support Al Qaeda. No, Iraq was not involved in the planning or operation of the 9/11 attacks. And no, not a single alleged hijacker was an Iraqi. It’s “no” to the Iraq nexus all the way down the line.

And still, the attacks on 9/11 and the invasion and occupation of Iraq are interminably and intrinsically intertwined and neither tragedy can be fully discussed without the other. The hard fact is: had there been no attack on American soil on September 11th, there would not and could not have been a war in Iraq. And, conversely, if there was going to be military action by the US against Iraq by Bushco, there first had to be an unprecedented attack on American soil.

Sadly, but predictably, the correct connection between the two has never adequately surfaced. Certainly, the corporate news networks were fully complicit in shaping the public’s belief that Iraq was involved in the attacks of 9/11. Much of the nation, and a great percentage of the military still hold that belief, and little has been done to expose this calculated fabrication. Still, despite all we have learned, no one in the public arena has focused on the accurate and vitally important connection between the two events.

Despite all they have learned about the litany of lies and distortions that led to this failed war, most Americans still will not even consider the possibility that the attacks of 9/11 had to happen so that the premeditated plans for invading Iraq could be carried out.

That fact is a logical certainty which most people understand on some level of awareness. The public realizes that the attacks of 9/11 and to the Bush/PNAC invasion of Iraq are somehow interwoven, but most Americans cannot bring themselves to deal with the correct cause and effect sequence: Iraq was in no way responsible for what happened on 9/11, but 9/11 was in every way responsible for what happened in Iraq.

But no one outside the 9/11 Truth Movement dares to say that. Despite all we know, and despite all the dots that have been connected, discussion of 9/11 as a necessary event in the PNAC strategy for global domination remains taboo.

Let’s look at what we do know, - not what we suspect, but what is documented and verifiable fact:

• Members of the Project for a New American Century proposed American wars in Afghanistan and Iraq years before George W. Bush came to power.

• Their treatise for Restructuring America’s Defense, also written before 2000, stated that the American people would not support such wars “absent a catastrophic and cataclysmic event like a new Pearl Harbor.”

• Members of PNAC took on high positions in the new Bush administration, including those of Vice President, Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of Defense, Deputy Secretary of State, Under-secretary for Arms Control and International Security, Special Assistant to the President, Members of the Defense Policy Advisory Board, Under-Secretary of Defense for Policy, and Special Envoy to Iraq and Afghanistan.

• The founder of PNAC, Bill Kristol, while never so identified, became a major television personality promoting the invasion of Iraq immediately after 9/11. He remains a propagandist for the Bush war policy to this day.

• Barely five hours after American Airlines Flight 77 plowed into the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld told his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq — even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks.

• In the summer of 2002, when the nation was still reeling from the events of 9/11, and was largely distracted by the war against the Taliban, Andrew Card and Karl Rove set up the White House Iraq Group. The group of nine experts, including Condoleezza Rice, Karen Hughes, Mary Matalin, Dick Cheney, Steven Hadley and Scooter Libby was formed to devise a plan that would sell the invasion of Iraq to the people of this country. They successfully formulated a plan to convince an unsuspecting public that invading Iraq was vital to their own security.

• The official version of 9/11 is replete with anomalies and inconsistencies, as well as uninvestigated challenges and discoveries. And yet, it remains the only explanation that the American people and the world must accept without question.

The rest is history. The premeditated invasion of Iraq was inevitable and launched as planned in March of 2003, and three and a half years later, we are still bogged down in this illegal and immoral war and bloody occupation. What boggles the mind is that any discussion of its causal relationship to 9/11 is still relegated to tin hat conspiracy theorists, or never mentioned at all.

For just one moment, consider how the foreign policy of this administration would have been different without the benefit of the attacks on American soil Understand that without the events of 9/11 Iraq would have been off the table for invasion and George Bush would never have become the ‘wartime president’ of his dreams. .

Then wonder why the President of the US refused to have an official investigation of 9/11 for a full year after the attacks, and why not one member of the mainstream media has presented a single item of the vast the new evidence about the events unearthed by the 9/11 Truth Community.

No questions about the official version of 9./11 is allowed anywhere in the mainstream media without derision and contempt. Imagine… NO QUESTIONS…..have been acknowledged or aired on any news network. The reasonable suspicion raised by knowledgeable experts and academics about these terrifying attacks have been swept under the rug along with their relationship to the present war in which we are so painfully trapped.

And no questions about the official version, despite its laughable explanations of what happened, will be investigated by the newly empowered Democrats in Congress. Whatever investigations are launched, this will not be among them. No one in power wants to peel back the layers of deceit that we have been fed. Wait and see.

By any logic, if you follow the dots, there is an obvious and transparent connection between 9/11 and Iraq. It is not the connection set forth by the Bush/PNAC warmongers who wanted to incite fear and loathing for the nation they wanted to control. It is not the connection that prompted US soldiers to believe they were fighting in Iraq to revenge the attacks of 9/11. It is a far more insidious connection that should be publicly examined and exposed.

But it will not. Wonder why.

THE US wants the world's scientists to develop technology to block sunlight as a last-ditch way to halt global warming.

It says research into techniques such as giant mirrors in space or reflective dust pumped into the atmosphere would be "important insurance" against rising emissions, and has lobbied for such a strategy to be recommended by a UN report on climate change, the first part of which is due out on Friday). ....